Oscar Week
2009
JIM BAWDEN
OUR HANDY DANDY
OSCARS BALLOT
BRAD PITT as a man who ages in reverse
in "TheCurious Case of Benjamin Button,"
Jim's favorite among the nominated Best
Picture contenders. But does he think
it's going to win the Oscar?
Jim's predictions,faves
aren't always the sameBy JIM BAWDEN
of TheColumnists.com
Here's my explanation for the plummeting popularity of TVs marathon telecasts of the annual Oscars marathon: Weve seen it all before.
There are the Golden Globes, the Screen Actors Guild awards, newsclips of the National Board of Review and New York Film Critics Awards and every other film awards show out there. And now, at last, the Academy Awards--the 81st annual edition.
The telecast in the U.S. will be on ABC, as usual, starting at 5 p.m.. on the West Coast and 8 p.m. on the East Coast.
No matter how many others already have given out their awards, attention must be paid to the Academy Awards. They're the big ones that really count. And they've been around since May 16, 1929, when the awards for 1927-28 were presented at a dinner at the Roosevelt Hotel in Hollywood. They'll go on and on next Sunday night with tears aplenty (particularly if Kate Winslet wins).Heres a handy dandy film ballot complete with my predictions in the major categories:
BEST PICTURE: Nominees are "The Curious Case of Benjamin Button," "Frost/Nixon," "Milk," "The Reader" and "Slumdog Millionaire."
SHOULD WIN: Call me a contrarian but I thought "The Curious Case of Benjamin Button" the best of the nominated pictures. "Milk" is a brilliant political tract that skillfully rewrote Harvey Milks life and got away with it. "Frost/Nixon" played better as a theater piece.
MISSING IN ACTION: I felt "Revolutionary Road" the years best English language movie but it never even got a nomination.
WILL WIN: "Slumdog Millionaire," a terrific picture, has been overpraised and may have already peaked. Remember how "Atonement" took a bucket of nominations but failed to win anything last year. However, "Slumdog Millionaire" already has best picture nods from the Golden Globes, National Board of Review, New York Film Critics. Still, an upset by "Benjamin Button" remains a possibility.
BEST ACTRESS: Anne Hathaway ("Rachel Getting Married"), Angelina Jolie ("The Changeling"), Melissa Leo ("Frozen River"), Meryl Streep ("Doubt"), Kate Winslet ("The Reader").
MISSING IN ACTION; Kate Winslet couldnt be nominated twice in the same category but I feel her performance in "Revolutionary Road" stronger than "The Reader." But the best female performance I saw this year was Michelle Williams in "Wendy and Lucy."
CAVEAT: I havent caught Melissa Leo ("Frozen River"). Has anybody? Of course or how could she have been nominated?
SHOULD WIN: Strongest of the four is Anne Hathaway in "Rachel Getting Married." And she took the National Board Of Review award as best actress. Can she overcome the Winslet juggernaut?
WILL WIN: This is Kate Winslets year but just maybe she wont get it. I mean can anybody tolerate one more weepy, incoherent outburst by Winslet. Remember Meryl Streep took The Screen Actors Guild award as best actress, an indication she remains vastly popular among the actual voters (Winslet won a SAG award as best supporting actress).
BEST ACTOR: Richard Jenkins ("The Visit"), Frank Langella ("Frost/Nixon"), Sean Penn ("Milk"), Brad Pitt ("Benjamin Button"), Mickey Rourke ("The Wrestler").
SHOULD WIN: Until last week I thought Penns marvelous turn as gay councilman Harvey Milk was tops. I still think Penn's great and hes obviously having a lot of fun. Then I watched with amazement Frank Langellas creepy turn as Richard Nixon and was transfixed. Behind the facade of getting all the Nixonian twitches down pat Langella imbues his character with empathy and flashes of true insight. So I say hes the best.
CAVEAT: I havent seen Richard Jenkins. No one I know has seen Jenkins in "The Visitor" except editor Ron Miller. And I have defiantly refused to see "The Wrestler" because Rourke looks so badon the weekend Ill finally relent and go and see him.
WILL WIN: This is a real horserace. Penn took the New York Film Critics. Rourke was the winner at the Golden Globes, a reminder people really like an underdog. Langella has been doing the talk show rounds. I still feel the momentum is with Sean Penn. Sorry about that, Frank and Mickey. Better luck next time.
SUPPORTING ACTOR: Josh Brolin ("Milk"), Robert Downey Jr. ("Tropic Thunder"), Philip Seymour Hoffman ("Doubt"), Heath Ledger ("The Dark Knight"), Michael Shannon ("Revolutionary Road").
SHOULD WIN: Brolin was at his best in "Milk." And he also scored this year as "W". Michael Shannon shook up "Revolutionary Road" with brilliant scenes as a mentally disturbed mathematician.
WILL WIN: The late Heath Ledger in "The Dark Knight" seems to be the overwhelming fave. And voters might also favor a nod to a movie that entertained such a vast legion of cinemagoers.
SUPPORTING ACTRESS: Amy Adams ("Doubt"), Penelope Cruz ("Vicky Cristina Barcelona"), Viola Davis ("Doubt"), Taraji P. Henson ("Benjamin Button"), Marisa Tomei ("The Wrestler").
SHOULD WIN: I thought Amy Adams gave the best performance of the four nominated actors in "Doubt." But Viola Davis might take votes away from her.
WILL WIN: Penelope Cruzs nomination in the supporting category is a cagey way for her to win the Oscar. She really should have been nominated as Best Actress. And she should win something. Shes beautiful, talented and very sexy.
BEST FOREIGN FILM: "Der Badeder Meinhof Complex," "The Class," "Departures," "Revanche," "Waltz With Bashir."
SHOULD/WILL WIN: Ive only seen one of the nominees: "The Class." And thats all I needed to see. "The Class" was the best movie Ive seen this year in any language, an absolute must-see.
BEST DIRECTOR: David Fincher, Ron Howard, Gus Van Sant, Stephen Daldry, Danny Boyle.
SHOULD/WILL WIN: I just feel "Slumdog Millionaire"s Danny Boyle will win in a squeaker. How could you not vote for this film that almost got released directly to DVD?
MISSING IN ACTION: Clint Eastwood (Gran Torino). Or did voters figure the old guy had already won enough?©2009 by Jim Bawden. The photo of Brad Pitt is courtesy of Paramount and Warner Bros. This column first posted Feb. 16, 2009.
You can comment on this column online. Please address your message to either "The Editors" or Jim Bawden. To send an email, click here and don't forget to mention Jim's name: talkback@thecolumnists.com
HOME About Us Index To
ArchivesTalkback Contact Us