TheColumnists.com

 

 OSCAR WEEK
2006

 PROF.
GORDON GREB

 

 PROFESSOR SHOCKED
BY MOVIE CENSORSHIP

Motion Picture Academy Pres.
F. Howard Stoopnagel attempts
to block federal inspectors from
seizing nominated films in raid.

Film Czar shuts down TV's Oscar show for indecency


By PROF. GORDON GREB
of TheColumnists.com

Something surprising happened when I sat down to write this week's column. As I needed material from the Internet about “Scarlet Street,” a film directed in l945 by Fritz Lang, I was utterly surprised when the Google search engine turned up the following:



 U. S. FILM CZAR SEIZES FILMS,
STOPS ACADEMY AWARDS NIGHT

LOS ANGELES - Why has Oscar Night been cancelled for
March 5?

Orders to stop the 2006 Academy Awards ceremony were delivered by government representatives to the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences here late last night and ABC Television immediately was told to take the program off its schedule. Everyone in the motion picture industry is in shock.
It's the first time in 78 years no awards will be given.

Federal agents swooped down on the film community last night, took control of the film vaults, and confiscated all of this year's Oscar-nominated motion pictures, according to an Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences spokesman, who said the Kodak Theater has been closed. He could not predict when it would open again.

“We're still trying to understand what happened,” said one dismayed producer, while being led away. One possible explanation is the rumor that the government will soon appoint a Film Czar to safeguard the cultural health and morality of the country against a creeping and debilitating sickness, which somehow is being blamed on the movies.

When the arresting officers of Homeland Security were asked why they were doing this, they asserted these films violated presidential executive order 61984 which forbade the showing of any motion picture deemed to be “obscene, indecent, immoral, inhuman, sacrilegious,” or that would tend to corrupt morals, incite crime or lead to violence.

At the news conference called by the motion picture unit of the agency this morning in Washington, D.C. a government representative who declined to give his name but resembled the former head of the country's international propaganda agency, the “Voice of America,” said, “We had to take this action now
because enough is enough. Hollywood continues to grind out trash, distorts our moral values, and constantly gives the world a false impression of our nation, which has been historically guided by fundamentalist Christian values. These measures were taken to stop the rioting in the Muslim world and let
them know that western democracies will not be
undermined by cartoons even if it takes the form of motion pictures.”

Asked to explain specifically why this year's nominees were banned, he went down the list. Each Best Picture Oscar nominee contains material inimical to the public welfare, he said. Four of the five pictures have already been rated “R” by Hollywood's own critical reviewing agency--the Motion Picture Association of America--proof in itself they had crossed the line:

“Brokeback Mountain” is immoral and unacceptable, he said, because it is likely to corrupt the minds of too many young viewers. It depicts two men on the screen not as heroic cowboys but as closet homosexuals engaged in sexually immoral acts and living lifestyles which society has long believed to be queer. (MPPA rating: R for sexuality, nudity, language and some violence).

“Capote” is very likely to increase crime and violence. It is a despicable attempt to win sympathy for criminal elements in our society by depicting the death penalty in capital cases as wrong. Viewers also are likely to be misled by the main character who falls in love with one of the condemned vicious
killers when it's perfectly clear he has no moral compass because he is a closet homosexual.
(MPAA rating: R for violent images and brief strong language).

“Crash” is politically incorrect and faultfinding liberal propaganda. It places the blame for racial hatred in Los Angeles mainly on hard-working, clean-living conservatives and unfairly depicts them in a bad light. This film is an attempt to replace 100 per cent Americanism with an unrealistic view of who is chiefly at fault for racism in a multi-cultural society. (MPPA rating: R for language, sexual content and some violence.)

"Munich” is historically incorrect and too violent.Although Steven Spielberg seems to have made a sincere effort to document the senseless murder of Olympic Games athletes and what followed afterward, the director plays too fast and loose with known evidence. The film leads us to believe it's the actual story. What we really see is vengeful action that is more fiction than fact and excessively brutal for sensitive viewers. (MPAA rating: R for strong graphic violence, some sexual content, nudity, and language.)

“Good Night and Good Luck” is politically incorrect and liberal propaganda. CBS newsman Edward R. Murrow is portrayed as a heroic figure when it was really Sen. Joseph McCarthy who deserved the praise. Thanks to today's conservative authors and revisionist historians, Sen. McCarthy is now seen as having done much good by rooting out communists and contributing to our victory in the Cold War. (MPPA rating: PG for mild thematic elements and some questionable language.)

These swift actions may be the result of growing pressure on the national government to control Hollywood film content, which has been building recently. Numerous religious organizations, unhappy with television and theater movies, apparently have convinced the President to use his executive authority to appoint a Film Czar to clean things up.
According to testimony by the U.S. Attorney General,
the Homeland Security Act gives the President all necessary authority to do what is needed.


 EDITOR'S NOTE: The foregoing column by Professor Greb--like movies themselves--is a complete fantasy. But only because the Supreme Court made censorship unconstitutional do we NOT have a Film Czar today. A
half-century ago, Greb's research helped the nine justices reach their unanimous decision against censorship in the landmark case, Burstyn v. Wilson, et al (1952).
Coming Soon: Read why Greb began his research on censorship in the first place: “Near Riot at Fort Dix Over Banned Movie.”

FILM CZAR'S NOTE: The federal authorities wish to commend this website for printing Prof. Greb's writings with a pink background as he is clearly a pinko. This subtle point will not be missed by shrewd readers of this page.

 

©2006 by Gordon Greb. The illustration is from IMSI's Master Clips Collection, 1895 Francisco Blvd. East, San Rafael, CA, 94901-5506, USA.The "Oscar" logo and the phrase "Academy Awards" are the registered trademarks of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences. This column first posted Feb. 27, 2006.


You can comment on this column online. Please address your message to either "The Editors" or Gordon Greb. To send an email, click here and don't forget to mention Gordon's name: talkback@thecolumnists.com

 HOME

 About Us

 Index To
Archives

 Talkback

 Contact Us