TheColumnists.com

 CHUCK McFADDEN

 

DREAM TEAM or

NIGHTMARE DUO?
 
MITT ROMNEY, left, and PAUL RYAN
....the GOP president/vice president ticket

Who should be excited?
Republicans or Demos?

By CHUCK McFADDEN
of TheColumnists.com

 


My old friend was on the phone, chuckling. “I’ll bet you Democrats are just wetting your pants with glee over Ryan’s selection/,” he said.

“We are slavering with anticipation,” I replied. “Romney has just lost Florida. Twenty-nine electoral votes, right out the window.”

My friend, a conservative Republican, didn’t argue the point too much. He did declare that once the nation realized that Rep. Paul Ryan had about the only plan on the table to head off looming fiscal disaster because of ever-growing entitlement programs, the Republicans would win the presidency.

That is presuming that the electorate will study Ryan’s proposals for Medicare vouchers and privatizing Social Security, decide that even though they are painful, Ryan-style cuts must be made.

Won’t happen. Most voters don’t study anything. All Obama and Biden have to do at this point is run around the country telling audiences that Romney/Ryan will “end Medicare as we know it.” Which has the added advantage of being true.

Oldsters, who vote in great numbers, will be terrified. Twenty-two per cent of voters in Florida are age 65 or older. Never mind that the Ryan changes wouldn’t affect those currently enrolled. “He’s going to take Medicare awa/y!” over and over again will do the trick.

Mitt Romney and Ryan will be forced to explain. Anytime you have to explain, you lose.

Pundits are predicting that policy wonk Ryan on the Republican ticket will solidify the contest into dueling concepts of what kind of government we want -- limited and frugal, or larger and nurturing.

Well, the race may be sharper, but it won’t be all that much different. It will simply shift the subject of attacks and counterattacks those poor devils in swing states will have to endure if they dare to turn on their television sets between now and November.

“Playbook,” the morning emailed newsletter from the political website/publication POLITICO had an interesting bit on the Ryan selection:

EMAIL DU JOUR, from a Dem. operative: "Here's my prediction. The cycle
of reaction will be exactly the one with Palin."


Press: Wow, interesting!

Democrats: Huh?

Press: He's so dynamic - what a boost of energy!

Republicans: What a great speech. The base loves him.

Democrats: Uh oh!

Republicans: The big mo has shifted our way!

Press: He's breathing new life, etc.

Democrats: But wait, there's more!

Press: Hmmmm.

Republicans: Uh oh!

Ryan’s selection did bring one immediate benefit to the Republicans. Deep-pocket donors, thrilled over it, started pouring even more money into Republican coffers. At last, someone with clear stated ideas about what needs to be done, and how to do it!

It has also shifted media attention away from the Romney income tax issue. Romney’s refusal to release any more of his income tax returns will, um, return, however. It’s too handy a Democratic cudgel to be neglected for long. On the other hand, it may draw attention away from the economy, the best thing Romney/Ryan have going for them.

There has also been some speculation-- istfully among the Dems--that the choice of Ryan may benefit them on down-ballot races, maybe even increase their chances of recapturing the House and hanging onto the Senate. That depends on whether Democratic candidates can somehow inject antipathy toward Ryan and fear of Medicare change into their races. Marginal at best.

So as Medicare takes center stage, the campaign may well boil down to competing priorities--do something to avoid going over a fiscal cliff (Republican) or keep Medicare as it is, serving seniors (Democrat). The question becomes which prospect will frighten voters more?

For now, Democrats are rejoicing. Ryan has offered them lots of targets. And in today’s down-and-dirty campaigns, that’s a campaign manager’s dream.

©2012 by Charles M. McFadden. The McFadden caricature is ©2001 by Jim Hummel.
This column first posted Aug. 20, 2012.

 

 HOME

 About Us

 Index To
Archives

 Talkback

 Contact Us